NOTE: if you are an easily offended overly Christian person, read this with caution. It's not inherently Christian bashing, but... it may say things that are a bit against your belief.
"Hot girl" here is defined as a human female that is, by your standards, sexually appealing (you would like to do her.)
Human males, being the horny little pricks that we are, created an adjective, hot, to define other humans. As per the general consensus, hot girls have large (relative) breasts, a good chest:waist:hip ratio, skinny but not overly so, with nice facial features (not defined here, also quite subjective.) Being tall helps too. (NOTE: I will get to "pretty" and "cute" later. Until then, assume those 3 are synonymous.) Why is that defined by most as "hot?" Love, being the master puppeteer that it is, is actually being controlled by other things: genetics and hormones. I am not saying that we're all robots with the drive only to reproduce, but that hormones are much more complicated than we can understand and are the reasons behind what is known as "love" (as inquired by the comic above, thank you Bill Watterson.) Simply speaking, our only task in this world is to pass on our genetics, making our offspring as good as we can. Love is something that (usually) aids that process, so hormones cause it because of that.
In the case of having a sexual relationship with one of these "hot girls," we are actually aiding our future generations. (Edited)The breasts are a slight indication toward the fertility and estrogen level of the woman, indicating that she is more likely to produce healthy, fertile offspring. Also, is the baby is female, she will inherit larger breasts which will in turn help her reproduce by being sexually appealing to other men. The good chest:waist:hip ratio, as well as the skinniness and nice facial features also have the same concept. Height is also usually an advantage in the playing field. Therefore, having offspring with a "hot" person will make your child, male or female, slightly genetically superior to the rest, making living (therefore, reproducing), better and easier for him. Therefore, we see and go after the hot girls simply because our hormones are telling us to, simply because it will help our future generations. But this is not what love is at all either! People love each other for kindness as well, despite their flaws. The reasoning behind loving a kind person is also the same concept. The offspring is more likely to be kind, thus more likely to be loved as you loved the kind person. Same for any cute or pretty girls out there. There is a niche (business as well as biological term) for kind, cute, and pretty girls in the world's guys' hearts, the simple fact being that you liking that cute guy/girl will mean that some person in the future will like your cute child.
This all falls under love: Hormones causing one other to want a relationship with each other, sexual or otherwise. While one may argue that true love is not hormonal, I would like to think that it is; it is just a long term hormonal effect that causes one person to lust for a single person over a long period of time (which should be good for genetics anyways).
Some Loose Ends:
Homosexuality/different sexualities: Same concept as above, just not toward the opposite gender and/or species and/or anything else.
Philanthropy: A form of love... but in a different form. Every organism is born with the drive to reproduce, but helping others' survival? For what reason? For what reason do prairie dogs keep guard for other prairie dogs? For what reason do some animals nurse babies of their own species but not of their genes? Because it is important to the survival of their species. If it helps your species survive, then do it.
Agree/Disagree? Post below.
EDIT: Grace pointed out that larger breasts don't necessarily directly affect the amount of milk they produce, so I'm changing that sentence up there to what I believe is really the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment